HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CELCOM (MALAYSIA) BERHAD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
TAN SRI DATO TAJUDIN RAMLI & ORS AND ANOTHER CASE (ENCL 170) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion on the exercise of court discretion. (Para 1) |
| 2. overview of the factual background of the suits. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
[1] This judgment discusses the exercise of the Court's discretion to:-
(1) allow amendment of Amended Defence and Counterclaim under O 20 rr 5(1) and/or 8(1) of the Rules of 2012 (RC) in the 2 above cases (2 Suits); and
(2) join a party as the fourth defendant in 2 counterclaims in the 2 Suits pursuant to O 15 rr 6(2)(b)(i), (ii) and/or 13A(1) RC.
B. Background
[2] The 2 Suits, Civil Suit No D5-22-610-2006 (1st Suit) and Civil Suit No D1-22-1960-2008 (2nd Suit), have been consolidated.
[3] In the 1st Suit, the plaintiff companies (Plaintiffs) claimed, among others, that 9 individual defendants had breached their fiduciary and statutory duties as directors of the Plaintiffs regarding, among others, certain contracts and transactions.
[4] The Plaintiffs alleged in the 2nd Suit, among others, that 7 defendants had conspired, either by lawful or unlawful means, to injure the Plaintiffs and had thereby caused loss to the Plaintiffs.
[5] Tan Sri Dato' Tajudin bin Ramli (1st Defendant) and Encik Bistamam bin Ramli (2nd Defendant) are the first and s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.