SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 MarsdenLR 44

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SHARMILA PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
RAMANI PERIASAMY PILLAI – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:N Subramaniyan ,Respondent Advocate: Mohd Rafik Rahem

JUDGMENT

Ahmad Bache J:

A. Introduction

[1] One, Krishnavani a/p Mookapillai died on 27 November 2017 intestate. Vide a Grant of Letters of Administration dated 29 October 2018, the eldest daughter, Sharmila Pillai ("Pemohon") was appointed as the Administrator and later the deceased's only son, Ramani a/l P Pillai ("Pemohon Bersama") was appointed the CoAdministrator of her estate.

[2] Vide Enclosure (26), Ramani had made an application to this Court to remove Sharmila as the Administrator so that he remains as the Sole Administrator.

[3] After perusing all the cause papers and hearing submission from both parties, this Court had dismissed the application with costs of RM3,000.00.

[4] Dissatisfied, Ramani had filed a Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeal.

[5] Herewith are the grounds of judgment for the decision.

Background Fact

[6] Krishnavani a/p Mookapillai (the Deceased) died intestate on 27 November 2017. She left behind Beneficiaries ie her husband, Periasami Chidambaram Pillai; daughter, Sharmila Pillai ("Pemohon"/Adminstrator); son, Ramani a/l P Pillai, ("Pemohon Bersama"/Co-Administrator) and Shobana Periyasamy, another daughter. Vide Enclosure (1), Sharmila Pillai ("Pemohon") w


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top