SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1332

HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
FOH CHONG & SONS SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH JOHOR BAHRU – Respondent
[Judicial Review Application No: JA-25-22-06/2021]



Petitioner Advocates:Gan Techiong,Wong Wan Ting ,Respondent Advocate: Muhammad Azzam Zainal,Suhana Sabil

Judicial review in land acquisition cases can proceed despite alternative remedies; speculative complaints regarding future restrictions lack merit.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The judgment pertains to a judicial review application made under O 53 of the Rules of Court 2012 concerning a land acquisition decision under the Land Acquisition Act 1960. The decision involved reducing the area of land intended for acquisition from 293 square meters to 229 square meters, impacting the applicants' property.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the applicants' grievances were speculative as they had not initiated any development plans prior to the acquisition.

Issues: The court addressed the legality and rationality of the respondent's decision to reduce the area of land, and whether it violated the applicants' rights under the law.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that judicial review could not be refused solely on the existence of other proceedings and reiterated that land acquisition decisions are susceptible to judicial review.

Result: The court dismissed the application with costs of RM5,000.00.

Table of Content
1. judicial review application filed to challenge land acquisition decision. (Para 1 , 3)
2. description of land and owners impacted by acquisition. (Para 5 , 6 , 12)
3. addressing the validity of the judicial review application amidst ongoing proceedings. (Para 15 , 16 , 21)
4. relevant legal statutes governing the case and their implications. (Para 24 , 26)
5. conclusion reached by the court regarding the complaint's merits. (Para 50 , 54)
Noor Hisham Ismail JC:

Introduction

[1] This was a judicial review application by the applicants under O 53 of the Rules of 2012 against the decision of the respondent dated 19 April 2021 in a land acquisition enquiry under the Land Acquisition Act 1960 (" LAA ").

[2] The said decision concerns with the respondent's action during the said enquiry to reduce the area of land to be acquired from 293 square meter as originally scheduled under s 8 of the LAA to a smaller area of 229 square meter and to that end had left certain portion of the remaining land not acquired belonging to the 1st applicant and some part of a building currently erected thereon belonging to the 2nd applicant to become encumbered as 'First Reserve of the Railway Protection Zone' under the Railways (Railway Protection Zone) Regulations 1998 ("the impugned decision").

[3] The reliefs prayed for in this judicial review application are essentially:

(a) an order of certiorari to quash the impugned decision and consequential thereto to cancel Form G and Form H dated 19 April 2021 issued by the respondent under LAA ; and

(b) an order of mandamus, to compel the respondent to hold a fresh enquiry to acquire the original area of 293 square meters as per the original layout plan and to acquire the whole of the said building so that post acquisition the whole of the remaining land would be free from any restrictions relating to Railway Protection Zone for future developments;

[4] At the conclusion of the hearing, I dismissed the application and the followings are the reasons for my decision.

Salient Facts

[5] The 1st applicant is the registered owner of a piece of land held under HS(D) 259379 PTB 12478 Bandar Johor Bahru comprising an area of approximately 2,187.8666 square meters ("the said land").

[6] The 2nd applicant is the tenant of the said land and have erected a temporary building above the said land with approval from the local authority ("the said building"). The said building is housed within it a restaurant operated by another third party.

[7] On 21 January 2021 the respondent caused to gazette a land acquisition notice under s 8 of LAA to declare the government's intention to acquire part of the said land comprising an area of 293 square meter ("the Scheduled Land") along with other lands for the purpose of building a public railway line linking Johor Bahru and Singapore known as "The Rapid Transit Link System Johor Bahru-Singapore Project At Mukim Bandar Johor Bahru In The District Of Johor Bahru" ("the Project").

[8] Consequent to the notice, a land enquiry was scheduled to take place on the 7 April 2021 at the respondent's office.

[9] Prior to the hearing, the applicants' valuers were shown with the layout plan of the Scheduled Land at the respondent's office ("the original layout plan"). The original layout plan showed that:

(a) the Scheduled Land was demarcated to be of a straight line parallel to the proposed railway alignment;

(b) the Scheduled Land is located at the corner of the said land which has dual frontage - on its south facing Jalan Ibrahim Sultan and on its west facing Jalan Lingkaran Dalam; and

(c) part of the said building which is closer to corner of the said land will fall to be within the boundary termed as 'First Reserve' of the 'Railway Protection Zone" as prescribed under the Railways (Railway Protection Zone) Regulations 1998 ("1998 Regulation").

[10] On the date of the hearing, the respondent adjourned the hearing to 19 April 2021 at the request of the owner of the Project ie the Malaysia Rapid Tra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top