SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 1732

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CHAN YUNG SHENG – Appellant
Versus
ZAKARIA AWANG – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:P Nirmala ,Respondent Advocate: Ranizan Mokhtar

Table of Content
1. appeal on damages awarded for prosthesis. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. expert evidence on prosthesis need. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court’s preference for one expert's testimony. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. respect for trial judge’s findings. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. adjustment of damages due to contingencies. (Para 30)
JUDGMENT

Darryl Goon Siew Chye JC:

[1] This was an appeal against the quantum of damages awarded by the Sessions Court against the Appellant in a judgment handed down on the 27th of March 2017. The appeal was confined to the award of the sum of RM1,369,883.60 by the learned Sessions Court Judge in respect of a prosthesis for the Respondent. The other sums awarded as damages were not challenged.

Background

[2] In the afternoon of the 31st of May 2017, while riding on his motorcycle, the Respondent, who was in his mid-fifties, met an accident with a motorcar driven by the Appellant. As a consequence of the accident, the Respondent suffered severe injuries resulting in his left leg being amputated above the knee.

[3] Having found liability on the part of the Appellant, the Sessions Court then addressed the issue of damages. Germane to the appeal at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top