SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 2039

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
DATUK KASI KL PALANIAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
MENARA EMBUN SDN BHD & ORS AND ANOTHER CASE – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:C M Owee ,Respondent Advocate: Shirin Devi Pathmanathan

[1] This judgment concerns 2 suits - Originating Summons No WA 24-NCC-410-09/2017 (OS 410) and Originating Summons No WA-24 NCC-411-09/2017 (OS 411). OS 410 and OS 411 were filed by the same Plaintiff pursuant to s 346 of the Companies Act 2016 . The facts surrounding both the Originating Summons relate to similar series of facts.

[2] The Plaintiff has filed 2 separate applications to convert the 2 Originating Summons into writ actions. I have allowed the applications. These are the full reasons for my decision.

Introduction

[3] In OS 410, the parties are as follows:

a) the Plaintiff is Datuk Kasi K L Palaniappan (DK);

b) the Defendants are:

i) the 1st Defendant is Modern Eden Sdn Bhd ("Modern Eden")

ii) the 2nd Defendant is Tan Sri Datuk Haji Mustapha Kamal Haji Abu Bakar ("TS MK");

iii) the 3rd Defendant is Felina Tan Sri Datuk Haji Mustapha Kamal ("Felina") who is TS MK's daughter;

iv) the 4th Defendant is MKN Holdings Sdn Bhd ("MKN Holdings"); and

v) the 5th Defendant is Setia Haruman Sdn Bhd ("Setia Haruman").

[4] The relief sought by DK in OS 410, among others, are:

a) declaration that the 2nd to the 4th Defendants respectively had managed and conducted the affairs of the 1st Defendant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top