SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 984

HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
PANCHANATH RATNAVALE – Appellant
Versus
SANDRA SEGARA MAHALINGAM & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. distribution of property under the will. (Para 1 , 2)
2. timeline and procedural history of the case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. claims based on the will and alleged malpractices. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. defendants' denials and defenses against allegations. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. court's duty to consider particulars of the pleadings. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 23)
6. application of laches as a defense. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
7. court's view on the timing of claims. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
8. allegations regarding lots 287 and 288 and evidential requirements. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
9. definition of breach of trust. (Para 43 , 44 , 45)
10. discussion of lots 290 and 461 concerning trust responsibilities. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)
11. claims regarding lot 3 and its forfeiture. (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60)
12. allegations against d1 and d2 regarding undisclosed funds. (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66)
13. implications of financial responsibilities on defendants. (Para 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71)
14. validity of transaction regarding lots 290 and 461. (Para 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76)
15. legal standard

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top