SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 2129

HIGH COURT MALAYA KOTA BHARU
INFRA QUEST SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PENGARAH HASIL DALAM NEGERI – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge of tax assessment based on time limits. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5)
2. entitlement of capital allowance relies on qualification of telecommunication towers as plant. (Para 22 , 24 , 40 , 41)
3. final ruling that reversed prior decisions, affirming appellant's claims. (Para 133 , 134)
Ahmad Bache JC:

Background Facts Leading To This Appeal

[1] Vide a notice of appeal dated 23 October 2013 the appellant ('the appellant/taxpayer') had appealed against the decision of the learned Special Commissioners of Income Tax ('the SCIT') dated 27 September 2013, who had decided in favour of the respondent, ie the Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri ('the respondent/revenue')

[2] The appeal was made, to this court by way of case-stated, dated 15 January 2014, filed by the SCIT, under para 34, Schedule 5 of the Income Tax Act 1967 ('Act 53') for the opinion of this court on questions of law.

[3] Hence, the legal issues for the determination of this court as stated by the SCIT, were the same issues that were heard by the SCIT, namely:-

(a) on the first issue of time bar:-

Whether the notices of assessment ('the impugned notices') issued by the respondent/revenue for the Years of Assess

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top