Back
MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA IPOH
KERIS PROPERTIES SDN BHD LWN. POH HUAT CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD
No, the court did not grant a stay of the adjudication decision. It explicitly rejected the plaintiff's application to suspend enforcement or execution proceedings related to the adjudication decision.[2] Instead, it allowed a modified alternative order for payments awarded under the decision to be held by the defendant's solicitors as stakeholder until final resolution of a related case.[3]
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for stay of adjudication decision. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. introduction of the case and its procedural background. (Para 3) |
[1] Di hadapan Mahkamah ini adalah permohonan Plaintif di Kandungan 1 menurut perenggan 16(1)(a) dan (b) dan subseksyen 16(2) Akta Pembayaran dan Adjudikasi Industri Pembinaan 2012 ("CIPAA 2012") dan A 92 k 4, Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 yang memohon Mahkamah ini memberikan perintah berikut:
(a) Segala tindakan pelaksanaan dan/atau penguatkuasaan dan/atau segala prosiding selanjutnya (termasuk prosiding penggulungan) berkenaan suatu keputusan melalui proses Adjudikasi bertarikh 24 November 2017 dalam Prosiding Adjudikasi No Rujukan KLRCA/ADJ/0593-2016 di antara Defendan dan Plaintif yang diberikan oleh Kevin Prakash ("Keputusan Adjudikasi") digantung sehingga Mahkamah Tinggi Ipoh membuat keputusan bagi Saman Pemula No AA-24C-05- 12/2017 dan Guaman Sivil No AA-22NCVC-111-07/2016.
(b) Secara alternatif, segala pembayaran yang diawardkan berikutan Keputusan Adjudikasi tersebut dibayar kepada Pengarah Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Abitration ("KLRCA") sehingga Saman Pemula No AA-24C-05/2017 dan Guaman Sivil No AA-22NCVC-111-07/2016 diputusk
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
