ZULKIFLEE SM ANWARUL HAQUE vs KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN IMIGRESEN MALAYSIA & ORS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2018 MarsdenLR 392

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ZULKIFLEE SM ANWARUL HAQUE – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN IMIGRESEN MALAYSIA & ORS – Respondent

Table of Content
1. applicant's challenges and the details of requested reliefs. (Para 1 , 2)
2. request for constitutional questions to be referred to the federal court. (Para 3 , 4)
3. facts of the travel ban and administrative actions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. findings on the application and the reliance on existing case law. (Para 11 , 12)
5. court observations on constitutional implications and existing law. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)

[1] In the Originating Summons (Encl 1), the applicant is seeking the following reliefs:

(i) an order of Certiorari to quash the travel ban imposed by the respondents against the applicant;

(ii) a declaration that the travel ban imposed on the applicant is in breach of art 5(1), art 8 and/or art 9 of the Federal Constitution and is therefore null, void and unconstitutional;

(iii) a declaration that the respondents have no power to impose the travel ban and had acted beyond their jurisdiction;

(iv) a declaration that the respondents have no unfettered discretion in imposing the travel ban;

(v) a declaration that the respondents cannot act under s 59 and s 59A of the Immigration Act 1959/63 ("Act 155") to deny the right to natural justi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2018 MarsdenLR 392

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPURZULKIFLEE SM ANWARUL HAQUE – AppellantVersusKETUA PENGARAH JABATAN IMIGRESEN MALAYSIA & ORS – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ZULKIFLEE SM ANWARUL HAQUE – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN IMIGRESEN MALAYSIA & ORS – Respondent