SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1544

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
TANG CHOON MENG & ORS – Appellant
Versus
KHOO BOO LAI & ORS – Respondent
[Civil Suit No: 31NCVC-431-10-2015]



Petitioner Advocates:Khoo Boo Lai,Gay Choon Hee Jimmy ,Respondent Advocate: Fung Kar Men,Rachel Ng

Procedural rules in probate actions must be adhered to strictly, and duplicative applications are impermissible.

Headnote:(1) This case involves an application pursuant to O 72 r 18 of the Rules of Court 2012. The facts detail disputes involving the applications for Grants of Administration in relation to a deceased individual's estate. The court granted the application on 11 May 2023 and dismissed the First Citee's application. (2) The issues pertain to the right of parties to challenge the application and the procedure followed. The court affirmed the necessity of compliance with probate procedure and the implications of duplicity in applications. (3) The court's final decision was to dismiss Enclosure 70 with no order as to costs.

Table of Content
1. application procedural requirements. (Para 1 , 3)
2. details regarding the deceased and beneficiaries. (Para 4 , 8 , 10 , 14)
3. arguments regarding objections and duplicity. (Para 16 , 22 , 27)
4. court's observations on procedural rules and merits. (Para 26 , 28 , 30)
5. final ruling and disposition. (Para 35)
Azizan Md Arshad JC:

[Enclosure 70 (First Citee)]

Introduction

[1] This application [Enclosure 70] by the First Citee pursuant to O 72 r 18 and O 92 r 4 of Rules of 2012 (" ROC ") . The Citee filed an application to strike out an application (encl 50) in requiring the Citees to bring into and leave at the Registry the "GERAN MENGENAI SURAT KUASA MENTADBIR" dated 7 April 2022 ("the grant") and issued by this Court on 19 May 2022.

[2] The Court granted the application (encl 50) on 11 May 2023 and dismissed the First Citee's (1st Citee) application (Enclosure 70). Parties are referred to as they were in the High Court.

Cause Papers

[3] The relevant cause papers pertaining to encl 70 are as follows:

(i) Notis Permohonan dated 29 September 2022 (Enclosure 70);

(ii) Afidavit Jawapan (2) affirmed by Tang Choon Meng on 29 September 2022 (Enclosure 72):

(iii) Afidavit Sokongan affirmed by John Khoo Boo Lai on 29 September 2022 (Enclosure 73);

(iv) Afidavit Jawapan affirmed by Tang Choon Meng on 17 October 2022 (Enclosure 78); and

(v) Afidavit Balasan affirmed by John Khoo Boo Lai on 31 October 2022 (Enclosure 82)

Background Facts As Submitted By Parties

[4] The Deceased, Tang Lam Ang @ Tan Bak Seng (NRIC No: 370626- 07-5193/3654913) ("Deceased") was a Malaysian citizen who resided at No 1359, Sungai Udang, 14310 Nibong Tebal, Seberang Perai Selatan, domiciled in Malaysia, and at the time of his death had properties within the jurisdiction of this Court.

[5] The 1st to 4th Citors are siblings and are the lawful children of the Deceased. Tan Choon Eng, Tan Zoon Hooi and Tan Choon Hong are also the Citors' siblings ("Citors' Siblings") and the lawful children of the Deceased. Together with the Citors, it is undisputed by parties that they are the Deceased's next of kin and beneficiaries to the Deceased's estate.

[6] In October 2015, the 1st to 3rd Citors appointed Ismail, Khoo & Associates to file an application to apply for the Grant of Letters of Administration vide Penang High Court Originating Summons No 31NCvC-431-10/2015 ("Application for Grant of LA"). The 1st Citee was the solicitor in charge of preparing all the relevant cause papers for the Application for Grant of LA.

[7] The 4th Citor, Tan Soke Meng was represented by Ong & Associates and the 2nd Citee was the solicitor in charge of the matter. The Citors' Siblings were represented by Arnold Andrew & Co and the 3rd Citee was the solicitor in charge of the matter.

[8] The Citors argues that contrary to the Citors' instructions and without their consent, the 1st and 2nd Citees had agreed to be appointed as co-administrators for the estate of the Deceased for the interest and benefit of the beneficiaries of the estate ("Order dated 11 April 2017")

[9] It is the Citors' allegation that the Citees' had at all material times failed, refused and/or neglected to provide the 1st to 3rd Citors with relevant updates or documents that were requested. As such, the 1st to 3rd Citors had appointed Faizul Hadi & Co as the 1st Citee had consistently ignored their queries for relevant information and documents but to no avail.

[10] By August 2021, more than 4 years had passed since the Order dated 11 April 2017, the 1st to 3rd Citors had appointed the Citors' solicitors, Mah Weng Kwai & Associates, to follow up on the status of the administration of the Deceased's estate. By way of a file search, the 1st to 3rd Citors discovered that the Citees are in fact not the administrators of the Deceased's estate, as the Grant of LA for the Deceased's estate had not been extracted.

[11] The 1st to 3rd Citors had applied to this Court to be joint administrators of the Deceased's estate and the matter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top