SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 494

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
HANSON QUARRY PRODUCTS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
CHONG BOON HENG & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Pannir Selvam Narayanasamy ,Respondent Advocate: Ahmad Zayd Ahmad Zuber

Table of Content
1. the basis of the lawsuit regarding the summary judgment against the first defendant. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. determining rely on earlier cases and procedural law concerning stay applications. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
Wong Kian Kheong J:

A. Introduction

[1] This judgment concerns the following two applications (2 Applications):

(1) in court enclosure no 21 (encl 21), the plaintiff company (Plaintiff) has applied for summary judgment against the first defendant (1st Defendant) for, among others, a sum of RM3,254,012.75 (Claim Sum), pursuant to a "Letter of Guarantee and Indemnity" dated 4 March 2002 [Guarantee/Indemnity (1st and 2nd Defendants)] which had been signed by the 1st Defendant and second defendant (2nd Defendant); and

(2) the 1st Defendant has filed an application in court enclosure no 35 (encl 35) for, among others, an order to stay this suit filed by the Plaintiff against three defendants (This Suit) pending the disposal of Shah Alam High court's Originating Summons (OS) No BA-24NCvC-975-06/2022 which has been instituted by the 1st Defendant against the Plaintiff (Suit 975).

B. Background

[2] The 1st and 2nd Defendants were directors of Generasi Nirwana Sdn Bhd

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top