HIGH COURT MALAYA GEORGETOWN
SURIA ACTIVE RESOURCES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PENANG REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PERDA) & ORS – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Striking Out)
Prelusion
[1] The Plaintiff (P) filed this suit against the five Defendants here. The 1st Defendant (D1/PERDA) applies to strike out P's claim (DI/PERDA's Striking Out Application).
[2] D1/PERDA applies to strike out P's claim under all four limbs of O 18 r 19(1). Under limb (a), DI/PERDA's ground is that P's claim discloses no reasonable cause of action. Under limb (b), D1/PERDA's ground is that P's claim is scandalous, frivolous or vexatious. Under limb(c), D1/PERDA's ground is that P's claim may prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of the suit. And under limb (d), D1/PERDA's ground is that P's claim is an abuse of the process of the Court.
[3] Should P's claim be struck out as against D1/PERDA?
The Parties And The Pertinent Pleaded Facts
[4] P is a construction industry contractor. D1/PERDA is a statutory body whose purpose is to develop the state of Penang. The 2nd Defendant (D2) is D1/PERDA's Chairman. The 3rd Defendant company (D3Co) is a construction company. The 4th and 5th Defendants (D4D5) are D3Co's directors and shareholders.
[5] D1/PERDA is the owner of the subject project
[6] D3Co is the main contractor for D1/PERDA's project
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.