SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 2706

HIGH COURT MALAYA ALOR SETAR
MOHAMAD ELIYAS SUIB – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Pyara Singh Dara Singh,Sukhdev Singh Mohan Singh ,Respondent Advocate: Aqharie Durranie Aziz

JUDGMENT

Arik Sanusi Yeop Johari JC:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal by the Respondent against the decision of this Court in allowing the Appellant's appeal against both conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Sessions Court Judge of Alor Setar on the Appellant for two Charges under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 [Act 234] (" DDA "), that are under s 12(2) of which is punishable under s 39A(1) of the same Act and under s 15(1)(a) of , respectively.

[2] The Respondent is the Public Prosecutor and the Appellant is the Accused in the Court below. In this Judgment, parties will be referred to as they were in the Sessions Court.

[3] For the First Charge, the Accused had been sentenced to 36 months imprisonment from the date of conviction (ie 8 January 2020) and four strokes, and for the Second Charge, 12 months imprisonment from the date of conviction and two years police supervision. Both imprisonment sentences are to run concurrently. Upon the Accused's application, the trial Court had granted stay of execution pending appeal and set bail at RM20,000.00.

Factual Background

[4] The Accused was charged under s 12(2) of DDA which is punishable under s 39A(1) of before the Se


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top