Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CONEFF CORPORATION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
VIVOCOM ENTERPRISE SDN BHD; DR ENG ZI XUN (APPLICANT) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the application involved subpoenas issued in arbitration. (Para 1 , 12) |
| 2. validity of subpoenas regarding evidence in arbitration. (Para 5 , 10 , 15) |
| 3. oppression and burden concerning subpoenas and evidence production. (Para 17 , 19 , 21 , 23) |
| 4. importance of relevance and materiality in arbitration proceedings. (Para 22 , 24 , 25 , 27) |
| 5. criteria for issuing subpoenas under arbitration laws. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 6. the court emphasized the importance of relevance in arbitration subpoenas. (Para 35 , 36) |
[1] This is an application to set aside a subpoena duces tecum as well as a subpoena ad testificandum.
[2] The Plaintiff is a private limited company involved in the construction business.
[3] Likewise the Defendant is a private limited company also involved in the construction business.
[4] The Applicant is an individual and the general manager of Geonamics (M) Sdn Bhd ("GSB").
Salient Background Facts
[5] The Plaintiff appointed the Defendant as the contractor to construct and complete the project described as 'Cadangan Membina 2 Menara Komersial Yang Mengandungi:
A. Menara 1 (30 Tingkat) dan Menara 2 (33 Tingkat)
I - Menara 1 (21 Tingkat) Tingkat 9 - Tingkat 29 Apartmen Ser
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
