Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
JITTRA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TEO SIEW ENG & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claim for property validation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding the enforceability of agreements. (Para 41 , 43) |
| 3. defendants challenge legality of the spa. (Para 44 , 45 , 47 , 51) |
| 4. court observations on authority and validity. (Para 46 , 49) |
| 5. court’s findings on binding agreements. (Para 58 , 60 , 61) |
[1] This is the Plaintiff's claim for inter alia a declaration that the Scheme of Arrangement ("SOA") as sanctioned and approved by the Shah Alam High Court vide an Order dated 19 March 2013 is valid and binding and for an order that the sale and purchase agreement dated 5 January 2015 ("SPA") in respect of the property held under title HS(D) No 111037, PT No 32947, Pekan Baru Subang, Daerah Petaling, Negeri Selangor ("the property") be specifically performed.
[2] In response, the 4th and 5th Defendants counterclaim inter alia for the following orders:
i. declaration that Plaintiff's nomination as the nominee of the 4th Defendant pursuant to a letter dated 8 December 2014 ("the nomination letter/the nomination") is null and/or void and/or has been revoked.
ii. that the Plaintiff has no locus standi to commence or continue with the proce
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
