Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
GOO SAW JIN – Appellant
Versus
HWANG SZE YUNN & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's dismissal reasons regarding application. (Para 1 , 7 , 12 , 15) |
| 2. investment scheme related claims and administration. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 9) |
| 3. background of the investment scheme and plaintiff's claims. (Para 5) |
| 4. arguments and contentions from both parties. (Para 6 , 8 , 10) |
| 5. court's observations on relevance and necessity. (Para 14) |
| 6. legal tests for relevance and necessity in discovery. (Para 19) |
| 7. defendant's arguments against discovery application. (Para 25) |
[1] The appellant and respondents in this appeal will be referred to by the original titles in the Court below, as "plaintiff" and "defendants" respectively. This is an appeal by the plaintiff against the dismissal of an application for discovery under O 24 Rules of 2012 (""). The decision was delivered by the Learned Session Court Judge on 11 January 2018. The matter has also been fixed for trial in the Sessions Court on 19 to 21 March 2018. The learned Sessions Court Judge and the Grounds of Judgment shall be referred to as "SCJ" and "GOJ" respectively. The Record of Appeal shall be referred to as "AR".
[2] The background to the suit is as follows. The plaintiff had entered into an investment sch
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
