SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 743

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TOKO INOMOTO & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. context of employment contracts. (Para 1 , 3)
2. court dismisses the application for judicial review. (Para 2)
3. employment terms and conditions. (Para 4 , 8)
4. challenges to the court's findings. (Para 5)

[1] The applicants in this case were musicians formerly employed by the Malaysian Philharmonic Orchestra (the MPO), the second respondent. The applicants sought an order of certiorari to quash an award of the Industrial Court [reported at [2016] 1 MELR 180; [2015] 2 LNS 1034], which ruled that the applicants were not permanent employees and which rejected the claim by the applicants that they had been unfairly dismissed.

[2] This Court dismissed the application for certiorari for the reasons set out here.

Background Facts

[3] The material background facts of this case are as follows.

[4] Each of the applicants had been employed by the MPO pursuant to a series of employment contracts. Some of the applicants had been employed since 1998. Each of these employment contracts were expressed to be for a fixed term. These contracts were renewed upon the expiry of their tenure. In the case of the fifth applicant, for example, his employment contract had been renewed six times

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top