Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SOCIETE GENERALE – Appellant
Versus
THE OWNERS AND/OR DEMISE CHARTERERS OF AND/OR OTHER PERSONS INTERESTED IN THE SH.... – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and application overview (Para 1 , 3 , 18) |
| 2. facts of the parties involved (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. nature of the admiralty action and parties' roles. (Para 7 , 9 , 11) |
| 4. understanding of writ renewal procedure (Para 19 , 21 , 27) |
| 5. assessment of service efforts on specific dates. (Para 22) |
[1] This is an admiralty action in rem against a vessel called "MAPLE" (IMO NO 9168477) filed by the Plaintiff via a writ WA-27NCC-30- 04/2017 (the Writ) filed on 5 April 2017. By virtue of O 6 r 7(1) of the Rules of 2012 (RoC 2012), the validity of the Writ expires on 4 October 2017. The Plaintiff has yet to file its statement of claim.
[2] On 20 October 2017 the Plaintiff obtained a Court order for the extension of the validity of the Writ for six months from 5 October 2017. On 4 April 2018 the Plaintiff filed another application for an order that the validity of the Writ be further extended for another 6 months from 5 April 2018 (Enclosure 14).
[3] On 11 April 2018, after considering the application and the affidavit in support of encl 14, I dismissed the application. The Plaintiff appealed against the dismissal.
Parties
[4] The Plaintiff, Societe Generale, is and was at
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
