MAGNA CAPITAL SDN BHD vs ELNA PCB (M) SDN BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2015 MarsdenLR 2384

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
MAGNA CAPITAL SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
ELNA PCB (M) SDN BHD – Respondent

Table of Content
1. unlawful termination and damages claims under agreement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. witness testimony and its basis in bankruptcy issues. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 11)
3. bankruptcy implications on management roles. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
4. prohibitions under bankruptcy law concerning management without approval. (Para 22 , 23 , 27)
5. final dismissal and counterclaim adjudication. (Para 30)

Wong Teck Meng JC:

Introduction

[1] The Plaintiff's case against the Defendant is based on the Defendant's unlawful termination of an agreement dated 1 April 2008 (hereinafter referred to as "the 2008 agreement"). The main relief sought by the Plaintiff is for declaration that the said 2008 Agreement is a valid and binding agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and is enforceable whereas the termination notice of the 2008 Agreement issued by the Defendant through the Defendant's solicitors dated 24 December 2010 is void and invalid. The rest of the Plaintiff's claim is for special damages suffered by the Defendant as a result of the wrongful termination of the said 2008 Agreement by the Defendant.

[2] The Defendant's defence is that the Defendant has the right to terminate the said 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2015 MarsdenLR 2384

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANGMAGNA CAPITAL SDN BHD – AppellantVersusELNA PCB (M) SDN BHD – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
MAGNA CAPITAL SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
ELNA PCB (M) SDN BHD – Respondent