Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
MUSTAPHA KAMIL ABDULLAH – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PEGAWAI EKSEKUTIF PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN SISA PEPEJAL DAN PEMBERSIHA.... – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the plaintiff's employment and transfer process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 2. plaintiff's claims and the defendants' arguments regarding the alleged appointment. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 3. court's analysis of the validity of the appointment and procedural requirements. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 4. final judgment dismissing the plaintiff's case. (Para 63) |
Introduction
[1] The Plaintiff was a civil servant working in the National Audit Department when he was seconded to the Solid Waste and Public Cleansing Management Corporation, the 2nd Defendant. Whilst serving with the 2nd Defendant, he applied to be transferred permanently to the 2nd Defendant. Thereafter, the 2nd Defendant took steps to give effect to his application, culminating in his release from government service by the Public Service Commission.
[2] The permanent transfer to the 2nd Defendant however, did not materialize as the 2n
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
