SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 2007

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
DHANESHVARAN S BASKARAN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Rajadevan ,Respondent Advocate: Chia Peck Yun

JUDGMENT

Tee Geok Hock JC:

Introduction

[1] Conflict of laws, or private international law, is a field of law which is fraught with complexities and uncertainties and which is seldom well-understood by the practitioners of law.

[2] This case is an example where the subordinate court as well as the solicitors for both parties overlooked the impact of the conflict of laws in the context of a foreign company suing in the Malaysian court a person resident in Malaysia under a contract which has an express term that the foreign law of contract shall apply to the contractual relationship between the parties. The oversight has led both parties' solicitors to make submissions based on the Malaysian law of contract which culminated in a decision of the subordinate court granting a summary judgment based on the Malaysian law of contract.

[3] On a fundamental point of law as to the applicable substantive contract law in a court suit involving a foreigner company and a local resident, the court is not bound by the parties' error of law as to the applicability of the substantive law of contract.

Background Facts

[4] The foreign Plaintiff, Singapore Airlines Ltd, entered into a contract with the Defenda


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top