SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 575

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
LETCHUMAY PALANIAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
MAHALINGAM SUBRAMANIAM & ANOR – Respondent


Introduction

[1] The plaintiff, Madame Letchumay Palaniappan claims against the defendant for damages; general and special damages due to injuries suffered from a road accident at about 11 am on the 10 June 2005 at KM26, Jalan Kuala Lumpur-Seremban, Kajang, Selangor. The plaintiff was a pedestrian crossing the road and the defendant, Mr Mahalingam Subramaniam, is the lorry driver driving motor lorry, registration number WCB 8396 whom the plaintiff alleged collided into her. The Sessions Court Judge ("SJ") found the plaintiff to be 100% negligent (liable) and dismissed the plaintiff's claim. The plaintiff appealed to the High Court against that decision on both issues on liability and quantum. I allowed the appeal and apportioned liability between the plaintiff at 70% and the defendant 30%.The plaintiff, still dissatisfied, appealed against my decision on both issues.

Findings On Liability By Sessions Judge (SJ)

[2] The findings on liability by SJ are as per below:

"Berdasarkan keterangan-keterangan ini, adalah dapatan saya bahawa kemalangan yang menimpa diri plaintif adalah 100% diakibatkan dari kelalaian dan kecuaian plaintif sendiri berdasarkan fakta-fakta berikut:-

1. Jika merujuk ke

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top