SPATIAL VENTURES SDN BHD vs TWINTECH HOLDINGS SDN BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2013 MarsdenLR 2042

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SPATIAL VENTURES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TWINTECH HOLDINGS SDN BHD – Respondent

Table of Content
1. consent judgment sets claims for damages. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 4 , 11)
2. factual background of the claim (Para 3 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 12)
3. engagement letters outline project management details. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 16)
4. plaintiff submits claims based on quantum meruit. (Para 13 , 14 , 21)
5. arguments presented by the parties (Para 15 , 20 , 22 , 23)
6. defendant argues on fee apportionment. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)
7. quantum meruit claims require proof of actual work and value. (Para 24 , 25 , 34)
8. court's reasoning on quantum meruit (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 31 , 33)
9. evidence lacking to substantiate claims. (Para 30 , 32 , 36)

[1] This is an appeal by the Defendant against the decision of the Deputy Registrar dated 15 April 2013, assessing damages on the Plaintiff's claim in the total sum of RM25,300,000.00 (RM25.3 million) together with costs of RM8,000.00. The assessment of damages was conducted pursuant to a consent judgment entered between the parties on 29 December 2012 ('the Consent Judgment') the terms of which are as follows:-

(i)The Defendant concedes to the Plaintiff's claim only in liability with the quantum of damages to be assessed by the Deputy Registrar;

(ii)The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2013 MarsdenLR 2042

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPURSPATIAL VENTURES SDN BHD – AppellantVersusTWINTECH HOLDINGS SDN BHD – Respondent

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SPATIAL VENTURES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TWINTECH HOLDINGS SDN BHD – Respondent