Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
BSS DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
WARGANET SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over property and contract terms. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. application for summary judgment and its dismissal. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. contempt allegations and compliance issues. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. ex parte application for committal proceedings. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. opposition to the committal order. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 6. hearing of applications and procedural considerations. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 7. court's analysis and inherent jurisdiction. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 8. court granted injunction and liberty to apply. (Para 51) |
Query: whether a Court hearing committal proceedings may grant an injunction order instead.
Introduction
[1] Instead of making a decision during committal proceedings on whether a contempt had been committed for allegedly disobeying an order for specific performance, this Court had deferred the decision of that question to a further and final hearing and made an order for injunction on 11 July 2023. Dissatisfied, the proposed contemnors appealed and these are the grounds for the decision made.
Salient Facts
[2] The dispute between the p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
