SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 1027

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
JASWINDER KAUR GURBACHAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MOKHTAR SINGH LAL SINGH – Respondent


Table of Content
1. facts surrounding the appellant's misconduct and the complaint. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)

[1] The Appellant filed for an order to set aside the decision of the Disciplinary Board (DB) dated 14 April 2016 in the Complaint No DC/15/9963 against the Appellant. The effect of which was to delete/withdraw the Appellant's register as a practicing lawyer (struck-off the Roll of Advocate & Solicitor); and an order to re-register the same and costs.

The Background Facts

[2] There was a sale and purchase transaction entered into between the Respondent as the vendor and another party as a purchaser of a property for the purchase price of RM300,000.00. The SPA dated 20 May 2014 was signed and the purchaser paid the deposit of RM10,000.00 to the estate agent for which RM2000.00 was deducted to pay the legal fees.

[3] Thereafter the sum of RM100,000.00 was paid to the Respondent by an online banking transfer dated 22 April 2015 in CIMB Bank. The balance of RM288,000.00 was paid on 17 September 2015 by a cash online in Hong Leong Bank.

[4] The Respondent lodged a complaint to the Bar on 10 January 2015 alleging a misconduct by the Appellant as he did not receive the balance of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top