SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 MarsdenLR 1148

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ETIQA GENERAL TAKAFUL BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
THAVAMANI KRISHNAN & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Raymond Sivasothey ,Respondent Advocate: Yudhistrevarman Inthiran

DECISION

Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin J:

Introduction

[1] Vide the Originating Summons ("the OS") documented in encl 1, the Plaintiff sought for a declaration pursuant to s 96(3) of the Road Transport Act 1987 ("the RTA ") that the Insurance Policy No K6542955 ("the Policy") issued by the Plaintiff for the coverage of motor vehicle BHM 5893 ('the Vehicle') for the period between 3 June 2016 until 2 June 2017 is void and unenforceable with respect to the accident on 25 April 2017 involving motor vehicle No NBE 1846 and the Vehicle driven by the 1st Defendant while carrying the 3rd Defendant as the passenger.

[2] Having heard from parties, this Court allowed the application. Dissatisfied, the 2nd and 3rd Defendants filed an appeal against the decision of this Court.

[3] The following are the reasons of this Court in allowing the application.

Background Facts

[4] This case arose out of an unfortunate accident on 25 April 2017 at Jalan Gemas - Rompin, Negeri Sembilan, involving the Vehicle. At the material time, the Vehicle was driven by the 1st Defendant wherein her children Dhaneshwar a/l P Krishnasamy (NRIC No: 031116-05-0221) (hereinafter referred to as "the 1st deceased"), Vharshiena a/


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top