SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 MarsdenLR 2430

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
RATHA VADEVELO – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Wong Hok Chong JC:

Appeal From Sessions' Court

[1] This is the Appellant Borrower's appeal against the Learned Sessions Court Judge's decision to allow the Respondent Bank to enter summary judgment against her. I heard the appeal and dismissed it on 2 March 2020. These are the grounds for my decision.

Background

[2] The background facts are as follows. The Appellant purchased the Property from Murali, who happened to be her husband, for the price of RM230,000.00 vide a Sale and Purchase Agreement dated 3 April 2017 ("SPA"). To finance the acquisition, the Appellant obtained a loan of RM203,078.00 from the Respondent Bank ("Loan") vide a Musharakah Mutanaqisah Master Agreement dated 18 May 2017 ("Loan Agreement") for the purchase of the Property. The transaction was completed. The loan sum was released as prescribed in the Loan Agreement and the SPA and the Property was transferred to the Appellant.

[3] The Respondent subsequently recalled the facility after the Appellant defaulted on the installment. The Respondent commenced the legal proceedings to recover the loan and obtained summary judgment against the Appellant, which is the subject of this appeal.

Counter-Claim - Unrelated


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top