SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 966

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CUSTOMCRAFT (M) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
YONG SIAK CHOONG – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Low Kin Fai,Yew Ding Wei ,Respondent Advocate: Edward Yii

JUDGMENT

Mohd Arief Emran Arifin JC:

A. Introduction

[1] The Plaintiff, Customcraft (M) Sdn Bhd, alleges that it had entered into a negotiation with Dato' Yong Siak Choong and MBIO Technologies Sdn Bhd for a project relating to a Palm Based Bio- Energy Booster sometime in March / April 2018.

[2] The individuals that were allegedly involved in the negotiations were one Chia Soon Hee, Dato Yeong Yin Kui (a director of the Plaintiff), and the 1st Defendant, Dato' Yong Siak Choong.

[3] It is sufficient for the purposes of the proceedings that parties have agreed that the said negotiations did fail and that the Memorandum of Understanding has no legal effect.

[4] The only issue that is left to be decided by this Court is the sums of RM150,000.00 that were allegedly paid to Dato Yong Siak Choong and whether the said sums should be repaid to the Plaintiff.

[5] The main issue is whether the said sum of RM150,000.00 was an advance payment to the 1st Defendant, Dato Yong Siak Choong, or it was a payment for the alleged formulae that was sold by the 1st Defendant to MBIO Technologies Sdn Bhd and paid by the Plaintiff indirectly through the investment in the latter.

B. Basic Facts

[6] I find that the f


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top