SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1873

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CHANTIKA KELANG BERAS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PADIBERAS NASIONAL BERHAD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:,Respondent Advocate:

Akhtar Tahir J:

Introduction

[1] The Plaintiff's claim against the Defendant is for non-payment for the paddy seeds supplied by the Plaintiff to the Defendant under a Paddy Incentive Program conducted by the Defendant.

[2] The Court in this case ruled that the issue of time limitation as raised by the Defendant in their Statement of Defense be determined first, before hearing the Plaintiff's main claim for non-payment against the Defendant.

Brief Facts

[3] The Plaintiff is a limited liability company incorporated in Malaysia. The Defendant is a limited company incorporated in Malaysia and involved in procurement and processing of paddy, warehousing, distribution and marketing of paddy seeds in Malaysia.

[4] Sometime beginning April 2007, the Defendant appointed the Plaintiff as one of its paddy seed supplier for its Paddy Seed Incentive Program known as "Rakan Benih".

[5] The Plaintiff was entitled to receive incentive payments for the paddy seeds supplied. The Plaintiff was given a certain quota as to the amount of the paddy seeds to be supplied.

[6] The Plaintiff contends that after the appointment by the Defendant and based on a representation made by the Defendant that because of the f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top