HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
YAP SIN KIEN – Appellant
Versus
ONG SOO CHAN & ANOR (ENCL 15) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[1] The parties to this suit have filed the following applications:-
(i) Enclosure 13 - Plaintiff's Application for Discovery under O 24 r 3 of the Rules of 2012;
(ii) Enclosure 15 - Defendants' Application for Bifurcation of the trial under O 33 r 2 of the Rules of 2012 or under O 34 r 1(b) of the Rules of ;
(iii) Enclosure 26 - Defendants' Application for Discovery under O 24 r 3 of the Rules of 2012
[2] I have considered the affidavits and submissions filed by parties. I have also heard counsels appearing for the Plaintiff and the Defendants on 27 April 2021. After carefully considering the applications referred to above, I decided as follows:-
(i) Enclosure 13 - Plaintiff's Application for Discovery under O 24 r 3 of the Rules of 2012;
"1. Adalah diperintahkan bahawa Defendan pertama dan kedua dalam tempoh 30 hari daripada tarikh perintah ini;-
a) Memfailkan dan menyampaikan afidavit menyatakan samaada dokumen dokumen berikut seperti yang dinyatakan atau diperihalkan atau golongan dokumen dinyatakan sedemikian atau diperihalkan adalah, atau telah pada bila-bila masa berada dalam milikan Defendan 1 dan ke 2, jagaan atau kuasa dan jika tidak, dalam
Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya & Ors v. Kerajaan Negeri Selangor and another Appeal
Ernst & Young (sued as a firm) v. SJ Asset Management Sdn Bhd (in liquidation) & Anor
Kingtime International Ltd v. Petrofac E & C Sdn Bhd
Rotta Research Lab v. Ho Tack Sien
Extreme System Sdn Bhd v. Ho Hup Construction Company Bhd & Ors (No 4)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.