2023 MarsdenLR 1883
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
ANUAR ABD AZIZ – Respondent
[Originating Summons No: WA-21NCVC-54-08/2020]
Service of tax notices under the Income Tax Act is deemed valid upon posting to the taxpayer's last known address, regardless of actual receipt.
Headnote:Statute Analysis: The Income Tax Act 1967 governs the obligations and assessment procedures for unpaid taxes. The Plaintiff sought summary judgment for RM10,484,396.96 due to the Defendant's failure to submit tax returns for Years of Assessment 2010 to 2015.
Findings of Court:
The Court found that the service of Notices of Assessment was valid as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act.
Issues: The key questions framed included whether the Notices of Assessment were effectively served, the conclusiveness of the amounts stated, and any defects relating to the Certificate of Indebtedness.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court reasoned that the Defendant's bare denial of service did not constitute a triable issue, emphasizing that under s 106(3) of the Income Tax Act, the Court could not entertain challenges to the amount of tax claimed.
Result: Summary judgment is granted in favor of the Plaintiff.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. taxation is a certainty in life. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. summary judgment sought for unpaid tax. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. key statutory provisions in tax assessment. (Para 7 , 12 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. denial of service does not establish a triable issue. (Para 24 , 26 , 32) |
| 5. court will not entertain defences to amount claimed. (Para 41 , 42 , 44) |
Introduction
[1]"In this world, nothing can be said to be certain except death and taxes".
[2] The above is a famous quote from the American statesman Benjamin Franklin in his 1789 letter to Jean-Baptiste Le Roy which said in part:
Our new Constitution is now established, and has an appearance that promises permanency; but in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.
[3] In fulfilment of the prophecy of certainty, the Malaysian government via the Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri ("LHDN") has now pursued the Defendant for unpaid tax by applying for summary judgment [Enclosure 42] pursuant to O 14 of the Rules of 2012 for recovery of tax arrears amounting to RM10,484,396.96 for the Defendant's failure to submit his Income Tax Forms as required under s 77 of the Income Tax Act 1967 for the Years of Assessment 2010 to 2015.
[4] The Defendant raised the following three alleged triable issues:
a) Whether the Notices of Assessment were effectively served and/or deemed to have been served on the Defendant by the Plaintiff;
b) Whether the amounts stated in the Notices of Assessment are conclusive and/or the assessment exercise for years 2010 to 2015 have been completed; and
c) Whether the Certificate of Indebtedness issued by the Plaintiff is defective.
[5] I heard counsel on 17 February 2023 and 20 March 2023 and allowed the summary judgment on 20 March 2023. The Defendant has filed an appeal to the Court of Appeal.
[6] These are my Grounds of Judgment.
Alleged Triable Issue [a]
Whether The Notices Of Assessment Were Effectively Served And/Or Deemed To Have Been Served On The Defendant By The Plaintiff
[7] I begin by examining the relevant sections under the Income Tax Act 1967 .
Sections 77 , 90(3), 96(1), 103(2), 106(1) And (3) And 145(1) And (2)(c) Of The Income Tax Act 1967
[8] Section 77 of the Income Tax Act 1967 provides:
Return of income by a person other than a company, trust body or co-operative society
77. (1) Every person, other than a company, trust body or co-operative society to which s 77A applies, shall for each year of assessment furnish to the Director General a return in the prescribed form:
(a) in the case of that person who is carrying on a business, not later than 30 June in the year following that year of assessment; or
(b) in any other case than the case in paragraph (a), not later than 30 April in the year following the year of assessmet...
[Emphasis Added]
[9] Section 90 (3) of the Income Tax Act 1967 states:
(3) Where a person for a year of assessment has not furnished a return in accordance with s 77 or s 77A, the Director General may according to the best of his judgment determine the amount of the chargeable income of that person for that year and make an assessment accordingly.
[Emphasis Added]
[10] Section 96 (1) of the Income Tax Act 1967 states:
(1) As soon as may be after an assessment, other than an assessment under subsection 90(1) and 91A(1), has been made, the Director General shall cause a notice of assessment to be served on the person in respect of whom the assessment was made.
[Emphasis Added]
[11] Section 103 (2) of the Income Tax Act 1967 states:
PART VII
COLLECTION AND RECOVERY OF TAX
Payment of tax
103. (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), tax payable under an assessment for a year of assessment shall be due and payable on the due date whether or not that person appeals against the assessment.
(2) Where an assessment is made under s 90(3), 91, 92 or 96A, or where an assessment is increased under s 101(2), the tax payable under the assessment or increased assessment shall, on the service of the notice of assessment or composite assessme