NAZRIN SHAHNAZ PEER MOHAMED vs AFFIN BANK BERHAD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 297

HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
NAZRIN SHAHNAZ PEER MOHAMED – Appellant
Versus
AFFIN BANK BERHAD – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Mohamad Amirul Adli Abdul Aziz ,Respondent Advocate: Fauzana Abdul Kari

Table of Content
1. introduction and reliefs sought by the applicant. (Para 1 , 2)
2. circumstances leading to applicant's claim regarding title and payment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 14 , 38 , 39)
3. court finds no obligation on respondent to provide title. (Para 20 , 21 , 26)
4. legal responsibility of parties regarding compliance with sale terms. (Para 32 , 34 , 37 , 41)
5. conclusion and outcome of the case. (Para 46)

Quay Chew Soon J:

Introduction

[1] The Applicant filed an Originating Summons dated 27 October 2022 ("OS") which sought for the following reliefs;

(i) that the Respondent be ordered to deliver to the Applicant the original copy of a separate individual issue document of title ("Title Deed") for the property known as Blok Akasia 15-8, Lengkok Kelicap, MK 12, Mutiara Perdana, 11900 Pulau Pinang which is currently held under the title GRN 70312, Lot No 11922, Mukim 12, South West District, Pulau Pinang ("Property");

(ii) that the Applicant be given an extension of time of 3 months from the receipt of the Title Deed to pay the balance of the auction price for the Property; and

(iii) alternatively, if the Respondent is unable or fails to deliver the Title Deed to the Applicant wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 297

HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANGNAZRIN SHAHNAZ PEER MOHAMED – AppellantVersusAFFIN BANK BERHAD – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
NAZRIN SHAHNAZ PEER MOHAMED – Appellant
Versus
AFFIN BANK BERHAD – Respondent