HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
MOHD RAFID AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
RAFIDAH AHMAD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's need for evidence in sibling relationship. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. ruling does not constitute final decisions for appeal. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. definition of aggrievement clarified with statutory reference. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
(Enclosure 79)
Introduction
[1] This was an application in encl 79 by the defendants for the plaintiff and 1st defendant to undergo a DNA test to confirm whether they are siblings. The plaintiff had filed a writ to claim inter alia that he be given a share in the estate of their mother's estate. The defendants' contention was that the plaintiff is an adopted child and therefore not entitled to inherit their mother's property. Enclosure 79 was filed by the defendants to verify the claim that the plaintiff was indeed a biological child of their mother. The issue in this application is whether the plaintiff should undergo the test or not. I made a ruling that the application be allowed but the plaintiff to willingly without compulsion submit to the test.
[2] The reasons for the defendants' application were:
"1. Defendan Pertama percaya bahawa Plaintif bukan abang kandungnya dan bukan anak kandung Noriah binti Hashim dan Ahmad bin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.