[1] This is the the appellant's appeal against the decision of the Sessions Court in dismissing the appellant's claim against the 1st to the 3rd respondents vide Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court Suit No.: B52NCVC-380-12/2014 ("the 2014 Suit") and in allowing part of the 1st respondent's counterclaim after a full trial.

[2] In the 2014 Suit, the appellant had claimed for a sum of RM 870,110.64 ("the appellant's claim") from the respondents being outstanding rental of RM 210,242.67 and outstanding electricity charges of RM 659,867.97 in respect of, initially, nine resorts nationwide owned by the appellant, which were subsequently reduced to eight resorts, due to the closure of one resort in April 2010, which were managed and maintained by the 1st respondent ("the TM Resorts").

[3] The 1st respondent had counterclaimed for, inter alia, a sum of RM 542,562.10 for the costs of maintenance and renovation works carried out by the 1st respondent to the nine TM Resorts, which the 1st respondent had paid on the appellant's behalf ("the 1st respondent's counterclaim").

[4] Below are the background facts of the appellant's claim and the 1st respondent's counterclaim.

[5] Telekom Malaysia