Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
ICE MAN SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. meter tampering method description. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. financial implications of tampering. (Para 4 , 6 , 19) |
| 3. defendant's claims and defenses. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. revenue loss calculation methodologies and standards. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 5. plaintiff's statutory rights to recover losses. (Para 24 , 28) |
| 6. legal precedents on statutory rights. (Para 30) |
| 7. court's authority and rights to enforce and validate claims. (Para 31) |
| 8. interpretation of statutory recovery rights for revenue losses. (Para 37) |
[1] The Plaintiff had supplied electricity to Defendant's factory which was producing ice at an address stated as PTD 140216 (MSB-1) and PTD 140216-1 (MSB-2), Jalan Berjaya 8/1, Taman Perindustrian Berjaya, Jalan Kempas Lama, Johor Bahru, where there were 2 separate main switch board account numbers for MSB-1 and MSB-2. Both meters were housed in the same meter room.
[2] During an inspection at the transformer room of the Defendant's factory by the Plaintiff's inspection team on the first occasion on 18 January 2013, it was found that bypass wires had been attached to S1 and S2 on the red, yellow and blue phases of the armoured cable after the terminal current transfo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
