SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 MarsdenLR 1200

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
ANUAR GHAZALI – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
[Criminal Application No: BA-44-21-01-2020]



Petitioner Advocates:Kamarul Hisham Kamaruddin ,Respondent Advocate: Devinderjit Kaur Gill

Charges for criminal breach of trust must detail the specific contractual implications; failure to do so violates the constitutional right to a fair trial.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code – Sections 154 and 156 – Constitutional law – Rights of the accused – Charges must specify the contract purportedly breached and particulars of the offence to ensure a fair trial – Failure to comply with s 154 renders charges defective and unable to proceed – Proceedings struck out as violation of constitutional rights. (Paras 44, 56, 74-111)

Facts of the case: The applicant, a CEO of a company, faced multiple charges of criminal breach of trust but contested the charges' validity due to non-compliance with procedural requirements specified in the CPC.

Findings of Court: Charges were held to be defective for not meeting mandatory requirements under s 154 CPC. The court concluded the proceedings against the applicant were an abuse of process that infringed his rights under the Federal Constitution.

Issues: Whether the charges complied with s 154 CPC and if a trial could proceed in violation of the applicant's constitutional rights.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity of specific particulars in charges for a fair trial, establishing that s 156 CPC does not cure deficiencies present before trial commencement.

Result: Application allowed; charges struck out.

JUDGMENT

Noorin Badaruddin J:

[1] This is an application by the applicant, Anuar bin Ghazali who was charged in the Magistrate's Court in Petaling Jaya on 4 April 2019 for two charges under s 405 of the Penal Code ("PC" ) seeking inter alia for the amended charges preferred against him by the respondent be set aside, struck out or stayed in limine on the following grounds:

(i) that the charges do not comply with s 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code (" CPC ");

(ii) that the non-compliance with s 154 infringes the applicant's constitutional rights and renders the proceedings in the subordinate Court null and void;

(iii) that s 156 CPC cannot cure objections towards defective charges raised at the outset of trial; and

(iv) that s 156 CPC cannot prevent a Court from striking out proceedings that are abuse of process.

[2] This Court has allowed the application and the reasons now follow.

Facts

[3] The applicant is the Chief Executive Officer and one of the directors of Carriercorp Petroleum Sdn Bhd ("the company") at the material time. The company is stated to be trading in supplying fuel/petroleum to suppliers and its customers.

[4] The applicant was charged in the Magistrate's Court in Petaling Jaya for two charges under s 405 of the PC punishable under s 406 PC.

[5] The original charges preferred against the applicant are as follows:

Pertuduhan Pertama

Bahawa kamu pada 16 December 2015 di Lapangan Terbang Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah dalam daerah Petaling, di negeri Selangor, yang diamanahkan penguasaan ke atas harta iaitu minyak Jet A1 berjumlah 16380 liter yang mana kamu telah melakukan satu pecah amanah jenayah berkenaan dengan harta tersebut dan oleh itu kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 406 Kanun Keseksaan.

Pertuduhan Kedua

Bahawa kamu pada 18 December 2015 di Lapangan Terbang Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah dalam daerah Petaling, di negeri Selangor, yang diamanahkan penguasaan ke atas harta iaitu minyak Jet A1 berjumlah 20000 liter yang mana kamu telah melakukan satu pecah amanah jenayah berkenaan dengan harta tersebut dan oleh itu kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 406 Kanun Keseksaan.

(Hereinafter referred to collectively as "two original charges")

[6] On 4 April 2019, after the two original charges were read to the applicant but before he gave a plea of not guilty, learned counsel for the applicant raised a preliminary objection towards the two original charges on the ground that they did not comply with s 154 of the CPC , namely that the two original charges failed to specify the method in which the applicant is said to have committed the offences.

[7] The documents under s 51A CPC were served on the applicant on the mention date on 8 May 2019.

[8] A notice of application dated 27 May 2019 ("NOA No. 1") was filed by the applicant in the Magistrate's Court which encompassed the preliminary objection raised by applicant's counsel on 4 April 2019.

[9] During the mention on 24 June 2019 (and before the hearing of the NOA No. 1), the learned Deputy Public Prosecutor ("DPP") preferred two amended charges on the applicant which read as follows:

Pertuduhan Pindaan Pertama

Bahawa kamu pada 16 December 2015 di Lapangan Terbang Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah, dalam daerah Petaling, di negeri Selangor yang diamanahkan dengan harta iaitu minyak Jet berjumlah 20,000 liter milik A1 (Ab Jalil bin Ninggal (no. K/p: 540721-04-5215)) iaitu pemegang saham syarikat Carriercorp Petroleum telah melakukan pecah amanah jenayah iaitu dengan curangnya melepaskan harta itu dengan melanggar apa-apa kontrak yang menetapkan cara bagaimana amanah itu perlu disempurnakan, yang nyata (atau disifatkan ada) mengenai penyempurnaan amanah itu dan oleh itu kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 406 Kanun Keseksaan.

Pertuduhan Pindaan Kedua

Bahawa kamu pada 18 December 2015 di Lapangan Terbang Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah, dalam daerah Petaling, di negeri Selangor yang diamanahkan dengan harta iaitu minyak Jet


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top