HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
JURIS TECHNOLOGIES SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
FOO TIANG SIN & ORS (ENCL 41) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. notification via email suffices for legal service. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. the court examined compliance with the ex parte order. (Para 3) |
[Court Enclosure No 41 (Committal Proceedings)]
A. Introduction
[1] The plaintiffs (Applicants) obtained leave of this Court to file this application (encl 41) to commit the first defendant (Respondent) for contempt of Court regarding the Respondent's breach of an ex parte Court order (Ex Parte Order). The Ex Parte Order, among others, compelled the Respondent to deliver to the Applicants' supervising solicitors any laptop, notebook, iPad, digital and optical storage devices (Electronic Devices) in the Respondent's possession and/or control.
[2] Enclosure 41 concerns the following issues:
(1) whether the Applicants are required under O 45 r 7(2)(a) of the Rules of 2012 (RC) to serve personally an original copy of the sealed Ex Parte Order on the Respondent when a copy of the sealed Ex Parte Order has been attached to an email sent by the Applicants' solicitors to the Respondent. This question concerns the construction of O 45 r 7(2)(a), 7(6)(b) and O 62 r 3 RC;
(2) did the Respondent breach the Ex Parte Order? In
Tan Sri Dato' (Dr) Rozali Ismail & Ors v. Lim Pang Cheong & Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.