Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LEE MAY LING – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal on conviction under sedition act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. discussion on joint trial and its implications. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. evaluation of evidence on publication and intent. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. evidence requirements for proving publication by the accused. (Para 11) |
| 5. court’s stance on seditious tendency. (Para 14 , 19 , 21) |
| 6. determination of seditious tendency based on statutory definitions. (Para 18) |
| 7. final ruling on appeal and sentencing. (Para 24) |
[1] This appeal is by the appellant, Lee May Ling against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge, Kuala Lumpur (hereinafter called 'the learned SCJ') meted out whereby the appellant was found guilty for an offence under s 4(1)(c) of the Sedition Act 1948 and sentenced to an imprisonment term of five (5) months and 22 days from 27 May 2016. There is also a cross-appeal by the prosecution against the inadequacy of sentence meted out by the learned SCJ.
Amended Charge:
Bahawa kamu bersama-sama diantara 12 Julai 2013 jam lebih kurang 9 pagi di pautan htips://www. facebook.com/photo php?Fbid+=617457598272144&set=a512860642065174.123291.509820495702522&type=1 &theatre dengan niat bersama telah m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
