SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 2383

HIGH COURT MALAYA ALOR SETAR
PP – Appellant
Versus
ONG CHIN SOON – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of appeal nature and initial charges. (Para 1 , 2)
2. magistrate's findings on prosecution shortcomings. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. prosecution's arguments regarding intent and possession. (Para 10 , 12)
4. requirements under act regarding possession and knowledge. (Para 13 , 14 , 19 , 21)
5. final ruling and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 23)
Choo Kah Sing JC:

Introduction

[1] This was an appeal brought by the prosecution against the decision of the Magistrate Court, Sungai Petani, where the learned Magistrate acquitted the respondent at the close of prosecution case on 25 August 2014. The respondent was charged with committing an offence under s 13(a) of the Poison Act 1952 ("the Act") which is punishable under s 32(2) of the same Act which carries a sentence of fine not exceeding three thousand ringgit or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year or both. The prosecution's appeal was heard before me, and on 23 June 2015, I dismissed the prosecution's appeal. The prosecution was not satisfied with my decision, and therefore, filed an appeal to the Court of Appeal. This judgment serves as the reasons for my decision; and the reasons are as below.

The Salient Fa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top