Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
YUSSERI SAID – Appellant
Versus
TEX CYCLE TECHNOLOGY (M) BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claim origin and prior ruling. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. plaintiff's background and company restructuring. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. plaintiff's claims for compensation. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. defendant's arguments against compensation. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. details of the 1246 suit and its implications. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. agreed issues for trial. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 7. court's observations on bod decisions. (Para 26 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 35) |
| 8. legal interpretations of entitlement to compensation. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
[1] The plaintiff's claim against the defendant is for the sum of RM500,000 being purported compensation in consideration of the plaintiff's agreement to be dismissed by the defendant as an executive officer of a company named Metro Koats Technology Sdn Bhd ('MKT').
[2] It is not disputed that MKT had earlier filed suit against the plaintiff vide Civil Suit No 22NCvC-1246-10/2012 ("the 1246 suit") wherein MKT had sued for the return of the company car which the plaintiff had refused to surrender. The plaintiff had also filed a counterclaim in the 1246 suit seeking for the payment of RM500,000 as compensation and the sum o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
