SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 2136

HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
TENAGA NASIONAL BHD – Appellant
Versus
EE-LIAN PLASTIC INDUSTRIES (M) SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff's background and claims overview (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. evidence of tampering and inspection details (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13)
3. key issues in the case identified (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
4. classification of legal provisions (Para 19 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. court's determination on tampering issue (Para 26 , 29 , 30)
6. potential offences identified (Para 31 , 32)
7. legislative basis for revenue recovery (Para 33 , 34)
8. conditions for recovery of loss of revenue (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 50)
9. final conclusion of the court (Para 53)

[1] After a full trial of the matter, I had on 20 December 2012 dismissed the plaintiff's suit with costs. I now set out the complete grounds for my decision.

Background

[2] The plaintiff was a supplier of electric power as a licensee under the Electricity Supply Act 1990 ( ESA ).

[3] The defendant was a consumer of electricity that was supplied by the plaintiff under an Account No. 0231-00280097-09 at the defendant's industrial premises located at Plot 137 @ Lorong Perindustrian Bukit Minyak 11, Bukit Minyak Industrial Park, 1400 Bukit Mertajam, Pulau Pinang (defendant's premises).

[4] In this action, the plaintiff sought to r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top