HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
WORLD GRAND DYNAMIC MARKETING SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
FJVAA SPA SDN BHD & ORS (ENCL 50) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court examines the authority of registrar in relation to subpoenas. (Para 1) |
| 2. court issues subpoenas to ensure witness testimonies are available for just adjudication. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. courts consider the relevance of evidence and necessity for subpoenas. (Para 6) |
(1) whether the Registrar of Trade Marks (Registrar) can apply to Court to set aside subpoenas which have been issued to the Registrar's officers [subpoenas had been applied for by the plaintiff company (Plaintiff)] on the ground that the subpoenas are frivolous as all the information needed by the Plaintiff from the Registrar's officers for the trial of this case may be obtained from a search of the records of Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia (MyIPO); and
(2) if the Court dismisses This Application, in view of s 63(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1976 ( TMA ), can the Court order costs of This Application be paid by the Registrar to the Plaintiff?
B. Background
[2] In this case:-
(1) the Plaintiff had filed an action (Original Action) against 5 defendants (Defendants) for the tort of passing off in respect of a mar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.