SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 2583

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
WORLD GRAND DYNAMIC MARKETING SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
FJVAA SPA SDN BHD & ORS (ENCL 50) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court examines the authority of registrar in relation to subpoenas. (Para 1)
2. court issues subpoenas to ensure witness testimonies are available for just adjudication. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
3. courts consider the relevance of evidence and necessity for subpoenas. (Para 6)
[1] In Court Encl No 50 (This Application), the following 2 questions arise:

(1) whether the Registrar of Trade Marks (Registrar) can apply to Court to set aside subpoenas which have been issued to the Registrar's officers [subpoenas had been applied for by the plaintiff company (Plaintiff)] on the ground that the subpoenas are frivolous as all the information needed by the Plaintiff from the Registrar's officers for the trial of this case may be obtained from a search of the records of Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia (MyIPO); and

(2) if the Court dismisses This Application, in view of s 63(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1976 ( TMA ), can the Court order costs of This Application be paid by the Registrar to the Plaintiff?

B. Background

[2] In this case:-

(1) the Plaintiff had filed an action (Original Action) against 5 defendants (Defendants) for the tort of passing off in respect of a mar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top