SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 3863

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
YONG JO @ YONG CHO JOONG & ORS – Appellant
Versus
YONG LI LING & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:David Cheong Peng Leong ,Respondent Advocate: Edmond Teh Aik Hua,Wong Kar Chun

JUDGMENT

Ahmad Shahrir Mohd Salleh J:

(Enclosure 95)

Introduction

[1] The plaintiffs claim that the defendants had misappropriated monies belonging to them from their various accounts maintained at several banks. In pursuing their claim against the defendants, the plaintiffs applied for discovery under O 24 r 7A(2) of the Rules of 2012 as well as O 92 r 4 of the same Rules.

[2] The application was made after proceedings against the defendants have commenced. They are made against a total of seven banks for various statements of accounts, photocopies of scanned cheques and statements of credit card accounts of the plaintiffs, the 1st defendant and several others. After hearing arguments, the plaintiffs' application was dismissed and subsequently the plaintiffs appealed.

Brief Background Facts

The Plaintiff's Case

[3] The 1st plaintiff and his wife founded a business concern which later became a group of companies consisting of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th plaintiffs ("Group Companies"). The Group Companies run the business of property leasing and business letting.

[4] The 1st defendant was the personal assistant of the 1st plaintiff. She was initially employed for that position by the 2nd plaintif


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top