SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 1447

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
PEMBINAAN JAYA ZIRA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BS SHEET PILES SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Mahsuri Hussein ,Respondent Advocate: Sobanaranee Venogopal

JUDGMENT

Choong Yeow Choy JC:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal by the Appellant/Defendant against the decision of the Sessions Court in allowing the Respondent/Plaintiffs application for summary judgment. The action filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff against the Appellant/Defendant in the Sessions Court was in relation to a construction claim and a subsequent settlement agreement entered into between the parties.

The Core Issues

[2] Foremost in this appeal is the question of whether this is a case in which the Appellant/Defendant has succeeded in raising an issue or question in dispute which ought to be tried or there ought for some other reason to be a trial within the meaning of O 14 r 3 of the Rules of 2012 .

[3] The ensuing issue is whether it is the Appellant/Defendant that is liable to pay the balance sum owed to and claimed by the Respondent/Plaintiff or some other third party. Put differently, the issue for determination is whether the Appellant/Defendant has been absolved from liability as per the balance sum owed to and claimed by the Respondent/Plaintiff.

The Parties And The Background Facts

[4] Pursuant to a work order alluded to in paragraph [1], the Appellant/Defendant


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top