SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 2864

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
WAYTHA MOORTHY PONNUSAMY – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENDAFTARAN PERTUBUHAN MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent
[Judicial Review No: WA-25-391-12/2020]



Petitioner Advocates:Annou Xavier ,Respondent Advocate: Liew Horng Bin

The cancellation of a society's registration under the Societies Act 1966 is valid if it adheres to the statutory requirements and does not infringe upon fundamental rights.

Headnote:(A) Societies Act 1966 - Sections 13(1)(c)(iv), 18 - Cancellation of registration of HINDRAF for contravening its own constitution - Judicial review sought to quash the Minister's decision and restore registration - Court found no illegality or unfairness in the decision-making process. (Paras 1, 3, 12, 45)

(B) Illegality - Decisions not made by persons vested with power - The cancellation letter was signed by an Assistant Registrar, which was valid under the Act. (Paras 14-21)

(C) Unfairness - No duty to provide reasons for the decision was established, and the decision was straightforward. (Paras 26-32)

(D) Rationality - No Wednesbury unreasonableness found; the decision was reasonable based on the evidence. (Paras 34-39) (E) Fundamental rights - Section 13(1)(c)(iv) of the Societies Act is a valid restriction under Article 10 of the Federal Constitution. (Paras 40-44)

Facts of the case:
The ROS cancelled the registration of HINDRAF due to breaches of its constitution, and the Minister upheld this decision.

Findings of Court:
The application for judicial review was dismissed, affirming the decisions made under the Societies Act.

Issues: Whether the cancellation was made by a person with authority, if reasons were needed, and if the decision was fair and reasonable.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the cancellation was validly executed, and the lack of reasons did not invalidate the decision.

Result: Judicial review application dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Amarjeet Singh Serjit Singh J:

Introduction

[1] On 30 September 2019, the Registrar of Societies ("ROS") cancelled the registration of HINDRAF, a nongovernmental organisation under s 13(1)(c)(iv) of the Societies Act 1966 for contravening provisions of the society's own constitution. (Hereinafter for brevity, all sections refer to the ). The society appealed to the Minister of Home Affairs ("the Minister") against the cancellation under s 18 of the Societies Act. On 7 August 2020, the Minister did not allow the appeal and confirmed the cancellation of the registration.

[2] The society, through its chairman, resorted to judicial review seeking an order of certiorari to quash the decision by the Minister followed by orders of mandamus compelling the Minister to allow the appeal by rejecting the decision of the ROS and an order directing the ROS to restore the registration of the society.

[3] On 29 January 2024, I dismissed the judicial review application. The reasons for my decision are as follows.

Background Facts

[4] The registration of the society was cancelled under s 13(1)(c)(iv). Under paragraph (1)(c)(iv) of s 13, the ROS is empowered to cancel the registration of a registered society if he is satisfied that the society has wilfully contravened, among others, any provision of the constitution or rules of the society. However, before making the cancellation of registration, the ROS is required, by virtue of, s 13(2), to notify one or more of the office-bearers of the society of his intention to cancel the registration of the society and give the said office-bearer or office-bearers an opportunity to submit reasons in writing within thirty days from the date of the notification why the registration of the society should not be cancelled.

[5] In the instant case, one Nurul Azhar bin Husin ("Nurul Azhar"), who is an Assistant Registrar of Societies and the Director of the Department of the Registrar of Societies Selangor issued the requisite notification to the chairman of the applicant and made the decision canceling the registration of the society. He was appointed by the Minister under s 3(1A). Then, pursuant to the express power conferred on the ROS by s 3B, the ROS delegated his powers to Nurul Azhar. It was pursuant to this delegation of powers that Nurul Azhar cancelled the registration of the society.

[6] On 15 July 2019, Nurul Azhar issued a notification under s 13(2) to the chairman of the society informing him of his intention to cancel the registration of the society on four specific breaches of the society's constitution. It is to be noted, that according to the constitution of the society, its registered address is Klang, Selangor. This would bring the society under the purview of the Department of the Registrar of Societies Selangor.

[7] The notification also informed that the applicant was given until 15 August 2019 to submit reasons in writing why the registration of the society should not be cancelled. The breaches of the provisions of the society's constitution identified in the notification were that of cls 7(12), 8(5), 10(2) and 10(4).

[8] The applicant sought for extension of time and further details regarding the years for which the alleged breaches occurred, which Nurul Azhar allowed in the letter dated 13 September 2019 and identified the years the breaches occurred. The specific breaches were re-drafted as follows:

(i) Clause 7(12): failure of the secretary general of the society to cause to be issued to the secretaries of branches/state the seven days of the convening of the annual general meeting of delegates ("AGM") after the registration of the society from 2013 to 2018;

(ii) Clause 8(5): the central committee failed to conduct at least eight meetings in a year and failed to issue the requisite notice calling for the meeting at least 7 days before convening the same for years 2013 to 2018;

(iii) Clause 10(2): the society's financial statement for years 2013, 2014, December 2015, and December 2016


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top