SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 403

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
LEE SIOU KEONG – Appellant
Versus
HO KAY YI – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ravin Woodhull,Nur Ayuni Jamri ,Respondent Advocate: Ong Chee Keong

JUDGMENT

Alice Loke Yee Ching JC:

Introduction

[1] The Appellant in this appeal is the Third Party and the Respondent the 2nd Defendant, in the proceedings in the Sessions Court. For convenience, they will be referred to as in the Court below. The proceedings before me are in relation to two matters:

(i) an appeal filed against the decision of the Sessions Court to dismiss the Third Party's application for production and inspection against the 2nd Defendant; and

(ii) an application by the 2nd Defendant [Encl 4] to adduce new evidence for the purposes of the appeal.

Background Facts

[2] The dispute between the parties arose out of the following factual scenario.

[3] Sometime in early March 2018, the Plaintiff was keen to rent suitable premises for its recycling business. The premises was to be used as a plastic recycling processing plant.

[4] At the material time, the 1st Defendant was the main tenant of property identified as Lots 11779 and 11781, comprising of Blocks 1, 2, 3, 5 and an office premise at Jalan Ikan Mata Duyong, Teluk Gong, 42000 Port Klang, Selangor ("the Properties"). The 1st Defendant was interested to let out the properties, and engaged The Roof Realty Sdn Bhd.("Roof Real


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top