SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 1319

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MOHAMMAD YAZID LIM MOHAMAD AZIZ & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
MOHD JAVED MOHD NIZAR & ANOR – Respondent
[Civil Suit No: S-23-66-2010]



Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - Plaintiffs (actor/comedian and actress) sued defendants (director and production company) for assault, battery, defamation, and breach of contract arising from a filming incident on 11 May 2010 (!) (!) - Court found 1st defendant and Halim intentionally assaulted 1st plaintiff with a glass mug and punches, causing two deep laceration wounds; rejected defendants' accidental/self-defence version (!) (!) - 2nd defendant held vicariously liable as 1st defendant was executive director and incident occurred in course of employment (!) (!) - Awarded RM100,000 general/aggravated damages to 1st plaintiff and RM20,000 to 2nd plaintiff for trauma; RM100 special damages for medical costs (!) (!) - Defamation claim for email to Artistes Association failed due to lack of original email evidence; earlier liability order set aside (!) (!) - Defendants' counterclaim for breach of contract and defamation dismissed; plaintiffs not habitually late or indisciplined (!) (!) - No special damages for loss of income as plaintiffs failed to prove pre/post-incident earnings comparison (!) (!) - Court relied on plaintiffs' credible testimony, medical evidence, and police report; rejected defendants' witnesses as biased (!) (!) - Costs of RM50,000 awarded to plaintiffs considering case complexity and duration (!) (!)

What is the test for vicarious liability of an employer for an employee's intentional wrongdoing? [p_791][p_812]

Is the defence of qualified privilege available for an email complaint to an artistes association? [p_891]

What quantum of general and aggravated damages is appropriate for assault causing facial lacerations and trauma? [p_952]


GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT

Su Geok Yiam J:

Background

[1] This is an action by the plaintiffs against the defendants for alleged physical assault, battery, defamation and also breach of contract.

[2] The 1st and 2nd plaintiffs are husband and wife. The 1st plaintiff is an actor and comedian in Malaysia. The 1st plaintiff is also well-known as "Johan Raja Lawak" in Malay or "King of Comedians" in English because he came out third in a competition for the best comedian which was organized by Astro in 2005.

[3] The 2nd plaintiff is an actress in Malaysia who is known on television as "Ozlynn Wati".

[4] The 2nd defendant is a private company incorporated under the Companies Act 1965. The 2nd defendant is a producer of films including films and programmes shown on television.

[5] By a written agreement dated 8 May 2010 ("the contract") which was signed by the 2nd plaintiff on behalf of herself and the 1st plaintiff on the one part and the 2nd defendant on the other part, the 1st and 2nd plaintiffs were engaged by the 2nd defendant to act in a horror play entitled "Bisikan Arwah" in Malay which means "Whisper of the Spirit" in English ("the play"). The play, which would have four episodes and which would be shown on television, was to be filmed by the 2nd defendant for Astro Prima. In the play, the 1st plaintiff was cast in the role of "Imran" whilst the 2nd plaintiff was cast in the role of Imran's wife, namely, "Amirah". The 2nd plaintiff was also cast in the role of "Siti".

[6] The fee for the plaintiffs' services was RM20,000.00. Out of this amount, a sum of RM10,000.00 was paid in advance upon the commencement of the filming of the play into the bank account of the 2nd plaintiff who received it on behalf of herself and the 1st plaintiff.

[7] The filming of the play was scheduled to be carried out at various locations in Sikamat, Seremban, Negeri Sembilan.

[8] The 1st defendant is a director of the 2nd defendant. The 1st defendant was also at the material time the Director of the play.

[9] According to the plaintiffs, at about 6.00 pm and at about 6.30 pm, on 11 May 2010, which was the third day of the filming of the scenes in the play involving the 1st and 2nd plaintiffs, one Anand, the Assistant Director of the play, instructed the plaintiffs to go to a restaurant, namely, Kedai Makan Faizal Maju ("the restaurant"), which was situated nearby to a house which was being rented by the 2nd defendant for the purposes of the filiming of the play in Sikamat, Seremban, ("the filming location") to attend a meeting concerning a change to the script of the play ("the script") which was originally scheduled to be filmed at 2.00 pm that day.

[10] At about 6.30 pm, when the plaintiffs reached the restaurant, the plaintiffs saw the 1st defendant and one of the crew members by the name of Halim ("Halim") seated at a table at the restaurant. When the plaintiffs met up with the 1st defendant and Halim, Halim shouted at the plaintiffs and scolded the 1st plaintiff because the plaintiffs were late in arriving at the filming location and also at the restaurant.

[11] The 1st defendant then abused the 1st plaintiff by uttering profanities against the 1st plaintiff's mother.

[12] The 1st defendant then threw a glass mug at the 1st plaintiff. The glass mug hit the 1st plaintiff on the left side of his forehead slightly above his left eyebrow and broke. The 1st defendant then overturned the table in front of him. Halim then punched the 1st plaintiff on his face. The 1st defendant then punched the 1st plaintiff on his face. He also kicked the 1st plaintiff. The 2nd plaintiff who tried to intervene to protect the 1st plaintiff was also kicked and punched by the 1st defendant and Halim.

[13] The 1st plaintiff sustained injuries to his forehead and face which led to severe bleeding. The 2nd plaintiff suffered from body aches.

[14] The 2nd plaintiff then drove the 1st plaintiff to the Pusat Rawatan Islam Darul Zaqwan Sdn Bhd in Seremban ("the private medical centre") to seek medi


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top