SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 589

HIGH COURT MALAYA ALOR SETAR
PP – Appellant
Versus
MOHD HISHAMMUDIN MOHD RAZAK & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of the charge against the accused. (Para 1 , 2)
2. requirements for proving possession and common intention. (Para 36 , 62)
3. conclusion on the prosecution's failure to establish a case. (Para 101)
Choo Kah Sing JC:

Introduction

[1] Mohd Hishamuddin Bin Mohd Razak ("the first accused") and Azrul Anuar Bin Osman ("the second accused") were jointly charged with one Ridzuan bin Yahya ("the deceased") with trafficking 13,995 grams of cannabis in contravention of s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (" DDA ") read together with s 34 of the Penal Code. The offence is punishable under s 39B(2) of the same Act, which carries a mandatory death sentence upon conviction.

[2] The charge is as follows:

Bahawa kamu bersama-sama seorang lagi yang telah meninggal dunia bernama Ridzuan bin Yahya (No K/P 730427-02-5851) pada 1 Ogos 2012, jam lebih kurang jam 9.30 malam, di hadapan rumah No 8/90, Ladang Victoria, Padang Serai, di dalam Daerah Kulim, di dalam Negeri Kedah Darul Aman, telah didapati mengedar dadah berbahaya iaitu Cannabis seberat 13,995 gram. Oleh yang demikian, kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 dan boleh d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top