Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
SHAHRUM KAZINDIN – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH PETALING SELANGOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compensation objections based on 'person interested' (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. interpretation and application of law regarding eligibility for compensation (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. equitable estoppel is not a defense against statutory provisions. (Para 11) |
| 4. estoppel cannot override statutory definitions of 'person interested' (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's role in assessing and determining compensation in land acquisition cases (Para 15 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. judicial authority to determine compensation without assessor constraint. (Para 17) |
| 7. dismissing reference leads to specific cost obligations. (Para 29 , 30 , 32) |
| 8. final dismissal of reference based on applicant's lack of locus standi (Para 33) |
[1] In this reference to the High Court (Reference), the applicant (Applicant) has objected to the compensation amounting to RM2,084,705.00 (Compensation) awarded by the respondent (Respondent) for the acquisition of part of the land held under title PM 4629, PT 1864, Sungai Buloh Mukim, Petaling District (Scheduled Land).
[2] According to the Selangor State Gazette (Gazette), the Scheduled Land was to be acquired on 21 April 2016 (Acquisition Date). The Gazette stated that the regi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
