SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 129

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TAN SRI DATUK TEE HOCK SENG – Appellant
Versus
DATO NG WEE YIEW – Respondent
[Suit No: WA-22NCVC-235-05-2017]



Petitioner Advocates:Mah Mun Yan ,Respondent Advocate: Tan Chong Li,Toh Chia Hua

A party must demonstrate capacity and legal standing when making property claims; failure to include necessary parties precludes the court from granting affirmative relief.

Headnote:In the judgment regarding the application for the writ and statement of claim ('SOC') to be struck out, it was asserted that under the Education Act 1961, the plaintiff seeks a declaratory relief regarding land ownership. The court found that the plaintiff lacked the authority to file the suit, as no proper resolution from the board of governors was presented. The main legal issues revolved around the definition of trustee rights and plaintiff's capacity to sue. The court framed the issues as whether the plaintiff could sufficiently prove standing to bring this action and whether the alleged responses were legally adequate. The reasoning underscored the importance of formalities when asserting legal claims regarding property, emphasizing that the failure to include necessary parties barred the action. Ultimately, the court concluded that the application to strike out the action was justified due to the plaintiff’s lack of standing and failure to demonstrate a cause of action, aligning with established judicial principles.

Table of Content
1. application details and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. defendant's response and claims of ownership. (Para 12)

[1] There is before me an application by the defendant herein, Ng Wee Yiew, for the writ and statement of claim ("SOC") against him in his capacity as the chairman of the board of governors of the Confucian Private Secondary School, Kuala Lumpur ("Confucian Private School") to be struck out. The Confucian Private School was established under the then Education Act 1961 ("EA").

[2] The plaintiff herein is Tee Hock Seng, who is suing in his capacity as the chairman of the board of governors of Sekolah Menengah (J) Kebangsaan Confucian ("SMJK Confucian").

[3] Both SMJK Confucian and Confucian Private School are situated on a piece of land known as No Hakmilik GRN 32862 Lot 147 Seksyen 56, Bandar Kuala Lumpur ("the said Land").

[4] It is not in dispute that the said Land is registered in the names of the trustees of Confucian Private School.

[5] The application to strike out, which is in encl 12, is made under O 18 r 19(1)(a) or alternatively under r 19(1)(b), (c) and/or (d) of the Rules of 2012 ("ROC").

[6] The subject matter of dispute in the suit herein is in respect of the said Land. The plaintiff in commencing the instant action seeks inter alia for a declaratory relief that the board of governors of SMJK Confucian and the board of governors of Confucian Private School are both the legal beneficial owners of the said Land.

The Plaintiff's Pleaded Case

[7] The said Land was contributed by the local Chinese community around 1917 for the use of what was then known as the Confucian School ("the original school").

[8] As a result of the introduction and implementation of the national education policy in the 1960s, the then Federal Government had invited the original school to be converted to an Assisted School. An Assisted School is defined by the then EA as a school in receipt of partial grant-in-aid. On 28 February 1962, it was resolved in the emergency meeting of the patrons of the original school that:

(a) The original school agreed to be converted to an Assisted School; and

(b) To set up a private secondary school.

[9] As a result of the conversion and in view of the condition that private classes shall cease to operate in Assisted School premises, the Confucian Private School was subsequently established in 1963. It occupied an auxiliary building situated on the said Land.

[10] At the material time, both the Confucian Private School and SMJK Confucian continued to enjoy the use and occupation of the said Land in their respective designated areas in the said Land.

[11] It is the plaintiff's case that without the consent of the board of governors of SMJK Confucian, the board of governors of the Confucian Private School had unilaterally omitted to register any members and/or representative from the board of governors of SMJK Confucian as trustees of the said Land.

[12] It is for this reason that the plaintiff seeks for the said declaratory relief.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top